1 Sept 2015

Interview with Michael Mullin, author of Simon


Michael Mullin, author of the modern day Hamlet retelling Simon was kind enough to answer my questions regarding his novel and of course Shakespeare.

Synopsis of the novel: 

His father is dead. His mother has remarried. His uncle is . . . his new stepfather? When the ghost of Simon Elsinore's father returns and claims he was murdered by his own brother, the nineteen-year-old film student must determine what is true and exact the revenge his father demands.

You can check out my review of Simon here.





Why Hamlet? Do you have a special relationship with this particular play?

I’m a bit of a Hamlet geek for sure, but not so much one of Shakespeare on the whole. I’ve always loved the depth of the story and the character in Hamlet. As a graduate student, I designed and taught a freshman writing course that was (oddly) called The Myth of the Hero. Along with some Joseph Campbell, I taught Hamlet, Frankenstein, Frank Miller’s Batman graphic novel The Dark Knight Returns and a near-final draft screenplay of Star Wars. (Cool course, I know.) I also wanted my son’s middle name to be Hamlet. That idea, however, was shot down.

How much did you lean on the original text?

I mostly used the Hamlet text for story arc, major plot points and characterizations. While writing the novel, there were certainly no questions as to what will happen next. It was more like: “How might that happen in a modern world?” What I tried most to avoid in my adaptation was anything that would come across to readers as me trying to be clever, matching up scenes and lines and interactions and such. The joke in my pitch is that I swear, Simon’s last name (Elsinore) is like the only time!

If you taught your book alongside Hamlet in high school which similarities/differences would you put emphasis on?

It’s interesting how universal themes like revenge and mortality translate over centuries and across cultures. I think discussions and analysis of this type would best engage students. Also, much-studied aspects of the original play like Perception vs. Reality could be looked at with regards to how we are “shown” the theatrical drama of Hamlet and how the fictional public in (and readers of) Simon are “shown” the story’s aftermath via the sensational news media.

Which character was the hardest to write? Why?

I’d have to say Juliana was the biggest challenge, evidenced by the fact that her scenes were rewritten the most. It was important to me that she was much more than merely a member of some supporting cast. Her familial backstory and her demise were of my own design, and I hoped to translate some of Ophelia’s reserved, mysterious qualities in a young woman who rings true as her own, interesting person.

How and/or why did the movie aspect come in?

I must confess a little bit of a “write what you know” autobiographical approach there. I studied film and filmmaking as an undergraduate (like a century ago), so it wasn’t too difficult to revert back to my nineteen-year-old self in that regard. That said, I went with the theme mainly for two reasons: first, it worked with today’s “YA” generation. Everyone films everything now, but Simon is “above” the common folk in his serious study of the medium. And second, Simon lives (just as Hamlet does) mainly in a world of his own creation. Every bit of dramatic action – and inaction – is crafted for a purpose. His purpose.
   
Do you yourself prefer written, performed or screened Shakespeare?

I haven’t even read all the plays, and I’ve only seen a couple of stage productions. I imagine theatrical versions must be the hardest to do without the highest level of talent (acting and production). I’m looking forward to seeing an onscreen version of the recent theatrical production starring Benedict Cumberbatch as Hamlet. That’s here in Los Angeles in November. That counts as performed, I think because it’s not a movie!   

Do you have a favourite Hamlet movie adaptation?

Give me the Kenneth Branagh full-text film from the mid 1990s any day.

If you had to choose a death from Shakespeare’s tragedies for yourself, which one would you opt for?

If recollection serves me, it’s mostly stabbings and poisonings, right? I’d say one in which I get to give a speech while it’s happening. That narrows it down a little, but perhaps not that much.

Would you consider retelling other stories of Shakespeare?

Not any time soon, no. I just don’t have that level of investment in any other work. Simon was the proverbial labour of love for me.

What project(s) are you currently working on?

A couple of years ago, I published a YA collection of three twisted fairytale retellings called TaleSpins. The first story (featuring the 8th dwarf no one knew about) has a graphic novel adaptation already out called 8: The Untold Story. I’m currently working on comic book versions for the other two TaleSpins stories.
I’m also throwing darts at the wall on an adult, thriller novel. Years ago, the story idea produced several unfinished drafts as a screenplay, so I’m weeding through that content, deciding on a direction.

Simon on Goodreads

Simon on Amazon

30 Aug 2015

Review - Chivalrous by Dina L. Sleiman


Title: Chivalrous (Valiant Hearts #2)

Author: Dina L. Sleiman 

Publication date: Sept 8, 2015

Rating: 2/5 stars

Synopsis:

Strong and adventurous Gwendolyn Barnes longs to be a knight like her chivalrous brothers. However, that is not an option for her, not even in the Arthurian-inspired Eden where she dwells. Her parents view her only as a marriage pawn, and her domineering father is determined to see her wed to a brutish man who will break her spirit.

When handsome, good-hearted Allen of Ellsworth arrives in Edendale searching for his place in the world, Gwendolyn spies in him the sort of fellow she could imagine marrying. Yet fate seems determined to keep them apart. Tournaments, intrigue, and battles--along with twists and turns aplenty--await these two as they struggle to find love, identity, and their true destinies.

I received a free ebook copy of this book from the publishers via NetGalley in exchange for an honest review.

My thoughts:

Chivalrous by Dina L. Sleiman was the first Christian fiction novel I read and I won’t want to start another one in the foreseeable future. I was raised a Roman Catholic and  – although I have a complicated relationship with God – I do believe in Him. I pray every day and I often see His work where others see coincidences. BUT I do not have the mindset that was represented in this novel, I couldn’t and, frankly, didn’t want to make it mine.

It’s okay if someone feels God’s presence and it brings him/her peace. It’s okay if a person silently recognizes that He leads him and he often thinks of Him. But to have God involved in every single thought of yours and not voice a sentence without His name... it’s called obsession in my dictionary. Even for a medieval setting the religious reasoning was too much. And I was surprised when suddenly, out of nowhere, it hit me because the story didn’t start out badly.

I enjoyed the beginning, right until the point Allen became a member of the council. This is how it went: on one page he was a religious, but reasonable guy, on the next he was a bigoted fellow who found fault after fault in the girl he fell in love with, a fellow who kept on worrying that God might not like that he desires a lady of ’ill behaviour’.

Examples for the ’faults’:

„If she was capable of fighting in a tournament as a man, what other troublesome deception might this enticing woman be prone to?”

or

„But perhaps this was God’s way of saving him from a woman who did not share his devotion.”

In other words: wanting to be yourself and not being blindly religious were unacceptable traits (or lack of traits) for our knight in shining armour.

In Gwen’s place I would have wanted to be saved from Sir Allen and his strange way of thinking… Fortunately by the end Sir Allen began to understand and accept Gwen the way she was (the fact that she started to feel closer to God helped a bit), but I still would have hooked up with Randel…

So all in all God was pushed onto the reader especially through Allen’s character and it resulted in serious eye-rolling from my part from time to time, it basically ruined the book for me.

I gave Chivalrous two stars only because it would have been a decent, entertaining tale without putting that much emphasis on religion. 

 

26 Aug 2015

"Waiting on" Wednesday #2


"Waiting on" Wednesday is a weekly event, hosted by breakingthespine, that spotlights upcoming releases that we are eagerly anticipating.

 This week's choice o' mine is a YA gothic novel that seems to be just my cup of tea.

Sanctuary by Jennifer McKissack

Date of publication: Sept 19, 2015

Synopsis:

After the untimely death of her aunt Laura, Cecilia Cross is forced to return to Sanctuary, a rambling, old French-Gothic mansion that crowns a remote island off the coast of Maine. Cecilia is both drawn to and repulsed by Sanctuary. The scent of the ocean intoxicates her, but she's also haunted by the ghosts of her past--of her father who died at Sanctuary five years ago, and of her mother who was committed soon after. The memories leave Cecilia feeling shaken, desperate to run away and forget her terrible family history.

But then a mysterious guest arrives at Sanctuary: Eli Bauer, a professor sent to examine Sanctuary's library. Cecilia is intrigued by this strange young man who seems so interested in her -- even more interested in her than in the books he is meant to be studying. Who is he and what does he want? Can Cecilia possibly trust her growing feelings for him? And can he help her make peace with her haunted, tragic past?

23 Aug 2015

Review - Simon by Michael Mullin


Title: Simon

Author: Michael Mullin

Rating: 4/5 stars

Synopsis:

His father is dead. His mother has remarried. His uncle is . . . his new stepfather? When the ghost of Simon Elsinore's father returns and claims he was murdered by his own brother, the nineteen-year-old film student must determine what is true and exact the revenge his father demands.

I received an ebook copy of this book from the author in exchange for an honest review.

My thoughts:

To tell the truth I have my issues with modernized Shakespeare, but from time to time I pick up a book or watch a film adaptation that sets one of the Bard’s story in modern times just to see if I can take anything away from it. Very often I don’t like the whole setting, the whole atmosphere of these works, simply because I adore the mood that Shakespeare originally created so much, it’s hard for me to stop expecting it to be there.

Now what is extremely interesting in the case of Michael Mullin’s Simon is that my favourite thing about it was the alienation I experienced when reading it. I kept pushing the story away to a safe distance where I could look at it with an analytical eye without having to be a part of it.

When I became conscious of my withdrawing from the happenings in Simon I started thinking of its reason – you see, I never felt the need to ’keep away’ from Shakespeare’s Hamlet this way, I was always eager to brood over matters of life and death together with the Prince never feeling the weight of it… and ay, there’s the rub… Simon, being set in today’s America, in our time, made Hamlet’s story REAL.

Simon begins with the end: from the news we get to know a massacre happened in the suburbia of an American town. Isn’t it something we hear in the telly every day? Murders, massacres, mayhem. It is too familiar and too tangible. In Simon the safety that the distance in time provides in the case of Hamlet disappeared and it made me feel uneasy. It may sound a bit contradictory, but the need to distance myself from the events of Simon brought me closer to Hamlet and made me see it from a different light. I think if a retelling opens new, interesting, windows on the original work it is well worth reading.

The story is well known, but of course you can’t rewrite it in the 21th century without making certain changes. I think Mr. Mullin did a good job with the little bits that eventually made this old tale adjust to the present. I especially enjoyed the usage of media and technology. I felt the book wanted to put an emphasis on the shift in communication that took place between then and now (Hamlet’s time and today).

I liked how the film as medium was represented in the book. Inserting the grave-digging ’scene’ was a phenomenal idea. Speaking of grave digging… the metaphors and symbols were very strong in Simon, sharp even, which I loved. The depiction of the wedding/funeral got me hooked in the very beginning.

The reason why I didn’t give 5 stars to this novel was Simon. He didn’t strike me as a Hamlet figure despite him being the title character. For me there was too much doing and too little reflecting when it came to him. Maybe I missed something, but he didn’t seem deep enough for me.

All in all, the stars and – I hope – this review tells everything. Happy reading, Shakespeare geeks!